Finally, finally!!…(uh)..wait,..was/is Anybody LISTENING??

Finally finally!! SOMEONE is LISTENING! [(uh)…was/is Anybody LISTENING??…(apparently ~Not?!?]
This Out-of-Control ROGUE Government AGENCY …WILL -Be forced to FOLLOW the LAW!!!!…. eventually...
BLM** & Dept of Interior* can’t continue to Be “totally Unchecked”& WITHOUT Checks/Balances forever ***
(as Laura said), THIS IS *BIG* Folks!

=== ¤ Best “Valentine” I’ve Ever ¤ Received !! ;D ===

finally!!…(uh)…WAS/Is Anybody LISTENING??


& Now, folks…Congress hits 1 to~please~ good-old-CZAR-Salazar! √just Born in the Wrong CENtury & WORLD, dude!*?*! (Try 1924…?)

And Now, folks…1 to ~please~ good-0ld-Sally-CZAR ! √just Born in the Wrong TIME & WORLD, dude?*! —- “Congress Demands that those danged WILD (& nasty) HORSES …Cover-up their foul penises” …ppllu-eese!?  🙂  ≈watch…

Congress, 1924: Rep. Demands Horses Wear Dresses To Hide Foul Penises
~~please click 2nd link, if 1st doesn’t work?

In June 1924 Representative Oliver Shaker (D) condemned government inaction on the issue of publicly exposed horse penis and
proposed a law which would federally require horses to wear modesty dresses….

here’s the ridicululous B.S. that SUE WALLIS, UCA, and Horse-eaters are spewing!
+ excerpt comments from The Force of the Horse:
“Poll Finds Big Ag Horse Slaughter Promotion Has Backfired!…
Press Release:
Americans Repulsed by Concept of Butchering & Feasting Upon Companion Animals:
Chicago– poll conducted in Jan by Lake Research Partners for ASPCA found that 80% of Americans are Strongly opposed to horse slaughter.”
—> now, read what Horse Slaughter lobby has 2 say!….

post~~never forget that Life–IS a Miracle~~

Scientific and Scholarly MISCONDUCT*{claim filed Against BLM!}*Intentional Exclusion* of LIVESTOCK-Grazing* as “Disturbance Factor” from *Rapid Ecoregional Assessments!

News! #Complaint of *Scientific and Scholarly MISCONDUCT* –{filed Against BLM!}
*Intentional Exclusion* of LIVESTOCK Grazing* as a “Disturbance Factor” from *Rapid_Ecoregional_Assessments BY Bureau of Land Management !

�Complainant: Filed BY Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER),
nonprofit svc org representing Public employees, including *Scientists working within Dept of Interior* (DOI), generally, + within U.S. Bureau of Land Management* (BLM), specifically.

�COMPLAINT Summary: BLM is conducting a �series of Rapid-Ecoregional-Assessments�
(REAs) to *establish Baseline condition* and *future Vulnerability of resources of
�Conservation Concern� vis-�-vis regionally *important Ecological and Environmental
*disturbance factors*.
�BLM intends to *conduct REAs* for “all Ecoregions which contain Land and Resources” under *BLM administration.
�These REAs are ~Intended to~ understand *ecological Conditions and *trends of Resources of
conservation Concern, such as fish and Wildlife Habitats, Species of concern, Soils, Water @regional level as *affected by Natural + Human “disturbance factors”*, such as: wildfire, invasive species, *Development (incl. #Energy-development activity),
*Climate change*, and other *CAUSAL Factors* of regional importance.
�These REAs are intended to:
*establish both *Baseline ecological Condition* data + *Predict future Vulnerabilities*,
�To PROVIDE *science-based information for
�Use in *future Resource-Planning* and *Decision-making within an �adaptive Management”-framework,
{including WILD HORSE Management/Mismanagement of HMAs, HAs, +hidden Holding facilities!!!}.

�LIVESTOCK Grazing ‘as a Causal_Agent’ was- *EXCLUDED from Further-Consideration*!! in ALL 6 Ecoregions*,
+ all ~proposed *Management �questions* Relevant to Condition Assessments� were *stricken-from-the-record*. !
�Intentional EXCLUSION of *Livestock-GRAZING*-as a Causal-Factor FROM the REAs* will *slant Resultant findings AND *Interpretations of Causes* responsible for status and… {read more link!}

Obama Administration Issues Impotent Horse Slaughter Commentary

ROCK, RANT, and ROLL!! Keep it up, keep it going, Time 2 ROAR!
just Do it ~Rock-ON 🙂

Obama Administration Issues Impotent Horse Slaughter Commentary.

Breaking News: BLM Issues Report on Inhumane Wild Horse Roundup Allegations

Pure in-your-face Deceit by Exec-branch Rogue AGENCY truly IS *Incredible, *Out-of-Control,, *dispairing, and *SCARY!! for us All!
IF a Federal Court *Judge, *Congressional Demands, & *official Report from Appointed “Experts” cannot Reign in- rogue Gov’t Agency??–> you’d better Believe that
it’s not Only legally-‘protected’ horses, burros, & range-lands that are IN TROUBLE now!!
It IS also You! & Me! & every “Right” you Think you have—that are in grave jeopardy., too !!

Breaking News: BLM Issues Report on Inhumane Wild Horse Roundup Allegations.

Hello world! what could U possibly Mean by Written Law?

I’m sorry, but I just Can NOT Understand!–several phrases [and Intents]!: (1)to accomplish this they are to be CONSIDERED IN in the Area where presently FOUND, as integral part of natural system of the public lands…
Matt said, Considered in area where presently found = key part, AND
(2) #Interpreted 2 mean: managers supposed to CONSIDER these areas FOR horses, but that does NOT mean they are REQUIRED 2 use ENTIRE area for Horses. Many wild horse Areas have “HERD AREAS” = much LARGER than Herd-#Management-Areas that horses actually Live in (PRYOR’s has a LITTLE bit of HMA out of HA)!! #!*WHY* ??
(3) PM-WHR = combination of agency + private rangelands AUTHORIZED FOR USE by wild horses.—!-Not to be CONFUSED with Wild Horse RANGE which =special Designation which only BLM-portion of PM-WHR has status. [???]
(4) Forest Service Planning documents for the Pryor’s ONLY ALLOW for management of “HORSES in Area Q” up there… !
–OK, IF Herd AREAS = the Areas where Horses WERE found 1971″, then #WHY are Wild Horses NOT #Authorized to Use# ANY and ALL of such Areas??
WHY would a HMA or RANGE ever EXCLUDE any of such legally-Entitled land area?? (and PM Horses may USE ONLY a LITTLE bit of their HA)?!! –this just makes absolutely *No Sense to me!!?
The so-called managers of this Law-given Land were chosen to be the BLM; so
WHY/HOW could any Mgr. only consider, but Not ALLOW protected wild Horses to HAVE ACCESS to every Inch of that land, which IS legally-set aside FOR them?? HOW do they consider any Personal Opinion— as ABOVE the Federal Law??
same– for the FOREST Svc (other Employees of tax-payers!); #I don’t CARE if# the FS or NPS have subsequently Planned, for any Reason, to give wild Horses ACCESS to ONLY a tiny portion called ‘Area Q’ up there!! WHY are they also ABOVE the Law??
When the 1971 law was enacted; Every bush, rock, soil space, hiking trail, road, water source, or ‘initials carved into a tree’:::that WERE WITHIN the HERD Area where HORSES were Found! >>was legally Designated *Primarily* FOR their *Use*! (and Only *secondarily* FOR any other purpose)! So, I do NOT understand
WHY it would be Differently interpreted for Land area that was *historically* or *subsequently* said to belong to a (especially a *PUBLIC-owned*/*entitled* Area), like *Forest Service*, or TO a *Park Service*, or TO a local *Neighborhood Watch area*, or Public *garden space*..!! the LAW stated: -That specific- land/soil/water area WAS to BE managed FOR wild horses!
And IF I or You had already, OR later, Planned-to-Use Any of it (land, tree, rock) for some other purpose of our Own, –then We SHOULD Not and Would Not be allowed to DO so!–If such other plan Use would EXCLUDE, in any way, Concurrent and Primary USE by the wild horses!!
i.e. We would be S-#-out-of-luck 🙂 ? and Expected to come up with a Different Plan..?!
soWHY would the *Forest Service* (& similarly in other areas, like a named *National REFUGE area*), or even *Aunt Beas Quilting Club* NOT be REQUIRED to comply with the law?? It should just be too bad for their *other plans*, as well?!
andeven though *subsequent laws* talk about Allowing for Multiple-USEs; such Extra dreamed-up Uses.. should also NOT be allowed to *Change the Primary* Use ??! If they can *non-intrusively Co-Exist* with the Horses USEthats fine! IF Notcome up with a different Plan!
[I am assuming here, *the Intent* of Multiple-Uses was mainly FOR/so Public citizens could also Use such land…like for hiking, camping, skiing, singing, meditation, swimming…etc]-but such Use could Not include Owning or Destroying or PERMANENTLY Changing that area FOR oneself, at the EXPENSE of *the Primary USE-rs* (Wild Horses/Burros)?!
Please explainWHY this is not Correct ??
[last question, i swear]: Exactly and Precisely, *WHAT ARE these multiple uses planned* for the Pryor Mountain HORSE AREA??, and for *the HMA*??, or for *the National Park*??, and
the *Custer National Forest* ???
WHAT exactly DO they *wish to USE this land FOR*that *necessitates Excluding legally-protected ACCESS* to the Wild Horses there ???
truly sorry if Im just too dense to Read & Understand the Intent of U.S. Law? (having earned a doctorate degreeone might conclude that I Should be able to logically understand Laws as written?) Maybe *Every One ELSE GETS it*!? & Im just an idiot citizenbut, I DONT THINK SO! ??


Leave a Reply

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 24 other followers

%d bloggers like this: